«I’ve always thought that democracy is the power of the people, but Comrade Roosevelt made it clear to me that democracy is the power of the American people.»
We are manipulated and used as cannon fodder, and we right and wrong puppet democrats continue to fight each other, instead of fighting those who pull the strings …
Most people consider democracy to be the more humane and just form of government. The promotion and development of democracy is the goal of some individuals, as well as of structures and entire states.
In the name of democracy, sanctions are imposed and bloody wars are fought, because the sovereignty of a state is secondary if it is not democratic.
According to some definitions, democracy is a conflict resolution mechanism, it does not eliminate all contradictions, but it coordinates them in such a way that destructive collisions do not occur.
The secret of this complex mechanism lies in the series of structures and institutions that allow for peaceful dialogue. Elective government, separation of powers, independent judiciary, respect for human rights, and respect for minorities are only part of the characteristics that a state with a democratic system includes.
At first glance, democracy is a unique and universal mechanism that should have the same application all over the world, but it turns out that it cannot be applied in practice as easily as in theory. But it is also incorrect to say that democracy itself can be diverse, since the limits of the term itself are lost in the possible diversity. All the difference in the application of the democratic mechanism lies in the difference in generally accepted values and principles between states. Therefore, even if some experts try to separate the model of state structure and the ideology of this state, in reality this is impossible. Likewise, democracy always has an ideological background. In this way, even Winston Churchill argued that Christian civilization was opposed to the Soviet Union.
The American eagle, as a guarantee of a true democracy, is losing its plumage faster and faster. The protests and pogroms show that the split in a democratic society has taken place in a definitive and irrevocable way. Up to this point, the United States has existed with more or less success, practicing the export of democracy to establish and reassert its hegemony. For 300 years, this state honored its history, respected and praised the founding fathers, and at the same time observed relative freedom of expression, but under no circumstances were people who questioned American values allowed to come to power. But the paradigm has changed, everything that was once worshiped has now become hated to such an extent that society is radically divided and the democratic mechanism of dialogue no longer works. (took off helmets)
All exports of democracy, as noted above, are closely related to the establishment of American world domination. A good deed, to bring democracy to a country, can be carried out in two ways, the Roman or the Carthaginian. A la Romana is the way for those who with open arms accept the correct North American values and establish the correct democracy, become a province and have legionaries on guard. This is the experience of the European Union. And if you do not rule in the Roman way, then there is a second way, Carthaginian rule, that is, power over chaos, through sanctions and wars. This is the experience of Iran, Russia and other traitors of democratic values.
In this fight for democracy around the world, one important point is missing. For a democracy to flourish, social justice and a well-fed society are needed. And surprisingly (sarcasm), all Democrats were wealthy at first and then they became Democrats. In this way, Europe gained its prosperity thanks to the colonial conquests and the United States, which has not lived a war in its territory for a long time, has created a stable middle class a stable middle class thanks to the businesses that were there , and right now we see how the middle class is disappearing.
But even if democracy collapses like a house of cards within America, the export machine of American democracy does not stop. Next, we will analyze the structures and organizations that fight for a correct democracy around the world.
Probably the most prominent organization of this type is USAID (United States Agency for International Development — United States Agency for International Development). Its budget is 40,000 million dollars annually. USAID’s direct activity is the financing of NGOs (non-governmental organizations), such as NED (National Endowment for Democracy), IFES (International Foundation for Electoral Systems), Freedom House.
As you know, who pays is the boss, like this Let’s take a look at who pays and what kind of commandments he does.
NED’s mission sounds strong and ambitious: to promote the establishment and development of democracy and freedom around the world. (They seem to have forgotten to add «our correct» democracy, but we read it between the lines) NED directly sponsors the NDI (National Democratic Institute) and the IRI (International Republican Institute). The organization is present in 90 countries around the world and its budget is around 100 million US dollars a year. And unsurprisingly, the backers of the NED itself are transnational bigwigs like Chevron, Coca-Cola, Goldman Sachs, Google, Microsoft, and the US Chamber of Commerce.
On the other hand, one of the best known organizations is Freedom House. It is an NGO based in Washington DC. His budget is around 30 million dollars a year. Until 2005, the boss was former CIA director James Woolsey. In fact, Freedom House is a well-known open American institute that organizes color revolutions.
Another fighter for democracy is the IRI, whose mission is to help individual countries build democracy. The chairman of the board of directors is Republican Senator from the state of Alaska, Dan Sullivan. IRI works with the US Department of State and USAID and has offices in more than 30 countries around the world. The budget of this organization is 50 million dollars.
An American fighter for world peace is USIP (United States Institute of Peace). The goal of this organization is to help resolve and prevent conflicts around the world. USIP provides research, analysis, and training to individuals in the field of diplomatic mediation and other peacebuilding measures and is funded by the United States Congress with a budget of $ 40 million a year. Apparently, the construction work and the consolidation of peace are not going very well, because how else to explain the situations that have developed in Libya, Syria or Afghanistan?
And finally, I would like to recall the very well known Open Society founded and led by George Soros, a Jew who, as a child during World War II, participated in the confiscation of the property of other Jews and does not regret it at all (https://youtu.be/YeThpbBGNQ8). The Open Society initiates and supports programs in the field of education, culture and art, health care, civic initiatives, the objective of which is «the development of the ideas and mechanisms of an open society», in other words , the objective is to destabilize the population, confuse it to make way for the color revolutions, following the instructions in the Gene Sharp manual. The budget for this «open society» exceeds US $ 19 billion a year.
And since the issue of international structures, fighters for democracy and peace in the world, has been touched upon, one more should be highlighted, a fighter, this time for prosperity and economic development, such as the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank . John Perkins is a former employee of the electrical engineering company Chas and the author of Confessions of an Economic Killer, in which he tells the story of how to drag third world countries into debt. I invite you to see his interview on this topic.
In closing, I would like to recall two prominent personalities, the Dallas brothers. One of them, John was the Secretary of State of the United States in the postwar years and the other, Allen was the director of the CIA. They created the wonderful International Health Organization (which has become so important in 2020), with the support and funding of Rockefeller. It would be absurd to believe that these people cared about the health of the population of planet Earth. They were interested in population control, because it is very easy to manipulate people with a subject as delicate as health, which is a matter of life and death. Brock Chisholm, a close friend of the previously mentioned Rockefeller, became the first president of the WHO between 1948 and 1953. His person can be noted for his rather blunt quotes. Here is one of them:
To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas. … The re-interpretation and eventually eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith in the certainties of the old people, these are the belated objectives of practically all effective psychotherapy.
Finally, of course, it is good to believe and fight for democracy, but its mechanisms have stopped working well a long time before. Furthermore, history teaches us that democracy does not always lead to good. Doing a brief historical review, let us remember that Hitler came to power democratically, thus carrying all the consequences. But what we really need to think about is ourselves, our lives, our values and principles, what we want to leave to the future generations. We are manipulated and used as cannon fodder, and we puppet democrats, the right ones and the wrong ones, continue to fight each other, instead of fighting those who pull the strings.